WIRED AI
filed
18h
Meta's Muse Is Better at Surveilling Than Helping Me
read it at the source — WIRED AI →
“The Muse app continues Meta’s trend of opting users into data collection for AI training. It also nudges you to share your bank account, email, and passport information.”
What was said about it
“That's kind of the joy of being human—getting to test things out and figure out what you like. So, the concept of turning all of that over to a machine is pretty horrifying to me.” My latest for @wired.com: www.wired.com/story/metas-...
4 likes
AI agents make you dumb! 🚨 www.wired.com/story/metas-...
3 likes
Also on the board
2 outlets
13h
2 outlets
2d
OpenAI
2d
TechCrunch
7h
TechCrunch
8h
← the whole board
Three kinds of line, three kinds of source. Every measurement is computed from primary artifacts we read ourselves — Hugging Face model cards and file listings, GitHub release feeds, OpenRouter's model catalogue. Every headline comes from the publisher's own feed, linked and attributed; no aggregator sits in between, and nothing is rewritten. Where a publisher syndicates a short summary in that same feed, it is shown under the headline the way a headline is — translated on the Korean page with the published original kept underneath it. Only the summary field is ever shown. The field that carries the article is read and never shown: it screens out 'summaries' that are really the article's opening lines, and — for a publisher's own announcements only — it is the evidence the event pages' What-happened notes are written and checked against. One exception, since 2026-09-03: the page a discussion thread links to is fetched and read once, to write a single sentence saying what it claims, labelled as the post's own claim; nothing from it is quoted. Every discussion is a public thread, linked, with its top comments in the order that thread ranked them and in the words they were written — selected by it, not by us.
lashhill · Models we are measuring · how this site works · RSS