WTF Is Going On(Weights, Tools & Frameworks)

English
OpenAI 보도

나비에-스토크스 밀레니엄 상 문제에 관하여

On the Navier–Stokes Millennium Prize Problem
원문 읽기 — OpenAI →

당사는 나비에-스토크스 밀레니엄 상 문제에 대한 AI 생성 해법을 공유하고 있으며, 여기에는 해설서와 Lean으로 작성된 정식 증명이 포함됩니다.

원문

“We’re sharing an AI-generated solution to the Navier–Stokes Millennium Prize Problem, including a writeup and a formal proof in Lean.”

어떤 얘기가 오갔나

541포인트 · 379댓글
it’s official: OpenAI claims they solved Navier-Stokes 10,000 concurrent agents coordinated by an internal model (that’s currently still in training) worked for 88 hours openai.com/index/navier...
6좋아요
openai.com/index/navier...
5좋아요
300 billion output tokens at astra price of $50/M is $1.5M. even very generously assuming an actual cost much lower than that, you're looking at hundreds of thousands easy openai.com/index/navier...
7좋아요
if you were feeling exhausted by AI discourse, I have some bad news
6좋아요
It's all just stochastic parrots and fancy autocomplete. It's a bubble! openai.com/index/navier...
4좋아요
Ah ben si en fait, une annonce officielle. Si on en juge l'historique des annonces précédentes qui ont été legit à chaque fois, on peut raisonnable s'y fier, même s'il faudra attendre sans doute un peu que la poussière retombe pour y voir …
3좋아요
It seems like some other mathematicians (not affiliated with openAI) have also (or close to) done this. A statement was posted about the surrounding events by one of the them: https://cims.nyu.edu/%7Etristanb/statement.pdf Also Terrence Ta…
다른 수학자들(OpenAI와 관련 없는)도 이와 비슷한(또는 거의 동일한) 작업을 한 것 같습니다. 그들 중 한 명이 관련 사건들에 대한 성명을 게시했습니다: https://cims.nyu.edu/%7Etristanb/statement.pdf 또한 Terrence Ta…
Buried under the drama is the fact that OpenAI is claiming that an internal model they’ve been training for less than two weeks is more than twice as capable in mathematics as Astra, which was only made public a week ago. Even if this impr…
드라마에 묻혀 있는 사실은, OpenAI가 2주도 안 되게 훈련시킨 내부 모델이 불과 일주일 전에 공개된 Astra보다 수학 능력에서 두 배 이상 뛰어나다고 주장하고 있다는 점입니다. 이게 무모해 보이더라도…
My take: 1. It shows what even this wave of AI can actually do. 2. I wish it were done by different folks, ideally under some kind of public control like NASA research or the NPR model. 3. Keep in mind: natural science is different. It's n…
내 생각: 1. 이번 AI 물결조차도 실제로 무엇을 할 수 있는지 보여준다. 2. 다른 사람들, 이상적으로는 NASA 연구나 NPR 모델 같은 일종의 공적 통제 아래에서 이루어졌으면 좋겠다. 3. 명심할 점: 자연과학은 다르다. 그것은…
Is this the one that was allegedly based on someone else's actual work & prompts? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49605915 https://bsky.app/profile/quantian.bsky.social/post/3muyhwbcd... https://cims.nyu.edu/~tristanb/statement.pdf
이게 혹시 다른 사람의 실제 작업물과 프롬프트를 기반으로 했다고 알려진 그건가요? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49605915 https://bsky.app/profile/quantian.bsky.social/post/3muyhwbcd... https://cims.nyu.edu/~tristanb/statement.pdf

상황판의 다른 소식