Instead of blathering on about incipient godheads, you can always just investigate and prosecute people. Australia to investigate if OpenAI hack of government health website broke the law techcrunch.com/2026/09/24/a...
> the breach took place on 18 June - Open AI informed the government with an email to a general address on 10 September So we have a company hacking a foreign government's websites and data. And, in terms of ethics, they take almost three …
If a bull escapes a field and causes damage in the village, the farmer pays for the damages and is liable. It's been like that for hundreds of years and I don't see how this is any different?
Having lived in Australia for a while, I’ve been struck by how clunky and outdated many of the software systems I’ve encountered are - particularly in government and banking sectors. In my experience, there’s often a bureaucratic approach …
Someone is always paying for the tokens (Agents running at OpenAI directly use their own models without paying directly, but even then it is not like inference is free). And someone is running the prompts. If they prompt agents and launch …
The thing I hate the most about tech, and I feel completely impotent to change minds on this, is the "fake life" tolerances it is afforded. Airbnb is not regulated like a hotel because it's tech. Crypto isn't betting because it's tech. Now…
I'm a little confused as to why these agents are capable of escaping containment. Can someone who has more understanding (or a better guess) of the harness they are running with shed some light? To establish the premise: as someone who has…